There are similarities between the stories of Noah from the Bible and Ziusudra hero of the Sumerian flood epic.

Both stories describe a flood myth.

Based on what kind of information/similarities we can say that both stories describe the same flood myth and that Noah and Ziusudra are the same persons, or they're not?

  • 1
    At first impulse, I want to say yes, both myths have similar origins, or one drew from the other.
    – user93
    Commented May 1, 2015 at 16:25
  • 2
    I would say they are the same person, to the same extent that they are also Deucalion.
    – Semaphore
    Commented May 1, 2015 at 16:33
  • @Semaphore I'm not exactly sure what you are saying, but I'm pretty sure Noah and Ziusudra myths predate Deucalion myths by a thousand years or better.
    – user93
    Commented May 1, 2015 at 16:36
  • @fredsbend Are you referring to when the myths were recorded? In that ase Ziusudra' tale predates Noah's by about 1000 years, and Noah's tale might have predated Deucalion's by perhaps a couple of centuries. But nothing prevents the events they describe to refer to the same time period.
    – Semaphore
    Commented May 1, 2015 at 16:50
  • @Semaphore Yes, but I thought we were talking about the relationship between the two myths, which leaves me confused why you'd bring up Deucalion, which comes around a good deal of time later.
    – user93
    Commented May 1, 2015 at 17:23

2 Answers 2


Both flood myths are certainly similar that it is sound to reason that they may have similar origins or one draws from the other. The Noahide flood myth is detailed in Genesis chapters 6 through 9 of the Jewish/Christian Bible. The Ziusudra flood myth is from a single tablet often called Eridu Genesis.


  • Both floods are brought about by divine intervention.
  • Both floods were for the express purpose to destroy mankind.
  • Both persons build an ark to survive the flood.
  • Both persons save pairs of animals as well.


  • Ziusudra was a king; Genesis neither states nor implies that Noah is anything other than average.
  • Ziusudra is part of a mythology that involves a pantheon of gods; Noah exists within the monotheistic Jewish mythology.
  • Enlil, a god to Ziusudra, was annoyed by all the noise that human cities and activities made, so he persuaded the other gods to wipe out mankind. Noah's God was grieved that he had ever made mankind because every thought and action of their's was only wicked, so he decided to destroy them.
  • Enki, another god to Ziusudra, was fond of Ziusudra so he resolved to save him in some way. Noah's God seems to be conflicted, favoring Noah because he is actually not wicked, so God resolves to save Noah, his family, and the animals.
  • Ziusudra is rewarded by the gods with immortality. Within the myth itself, Noah is not rewarded with anything (some theologies certainly say he has eternal life, but that is not derived from the myth itself). In fact, Noah praises God and sacrifices and worships!
  • Ziusudra's gods don't seem bothered that so many were killed. Noah's God promises that he will never again destroy mankind, showing perhaps regret for the whole affair.
  • Ziusudra's flood myth doesn't seem to bother with rebuilding and re-population; there's no pragmatism, as is typical for myths. Noah's flood myth goes into this a great deal (i.e. there's genealogies, locations named, who settled where, etc.) and the stories in Genesis start to sound a little more plausible and less like epic legends.


The dating of each myth suggests that the Sumerian Flood Epic (2300 BCE) may very well have influenced the development of the Jewish Flood Epic (1400 BCE to 700 BCE depending on who you ask). Many scholars believe that the whole Genesis creation myth (the first 11 chapters of Genesis) was influenced by the Babylonian version of the epic of Gilgamesh, which does mention a flood. Further, the Jewish people were held captive by the Babylonians in the 7th century BCE. This surely influenced their culture and already existing myths.

Jewish culture stands out among most other ancient cultures. Generally, they were xenophobic and extremely resistant to syncretism. They would fall away and worship other gods, but they were always defined by their "one true God". You can see this in the Noahide adaptation of "the flood that wiped out mankind". In Ziusudra's myth, the gods look at man like a plaything that entertains and aggravates them. The Jewish god loves his creation dearly and is grieved when they do wrong, not annoyed. Ziusudra's gods are one dimensional, having particular characteristics and persuasions, while the Jewish god is multifaceted and sometimes seems to contradict himself as a consequence of adapting these epics to revolve around a monotheism. In light of this, the differences between the two myths makes sense, while the core similarities remain.


  • I would suggest you read the lost book of Enki it goes into detail of the before and after of the flood. Commented Dec 31, 2016 at 21:37

You cannot deny the Hebrew-Sumerian connection, for example: in creation, both stories identify creation of modern man as the Adamu (derived from Adam); then, there was Abraham who was raised up from Ur of the Chaldeans.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.