I need a detailed answer to this question. Thank you!

  • 2
    Are you talking about the comics or actual Norse mythology?
    – dean1957
    Jan 21, 2021 at 0:18
  • Norse mythology. Jan 21, 2021 at 2:03
  • Kind of by definition, there is one Ragnarok. Other mythologies (Hindu comes to mind first) have a cyclic nature to the universe and think apocalyptic events happen as part of a repetitive cycle (pralaya comes to mind, although this is more an interlude between ages). I don't think Norse mythology requires that the universe ends with Ragnarok though - only that it is the end of the age of gods. I've even met someone who thought the Norse gods might have been real, and they had to pass from the world to make way for the Christian age. That sounds crazy to me, but who knows?
    – DWKraus
    Jan 23, 2021 at 19:27
  • @DWKraus Norse cosmology may be cyclical as well: See andejons' answer to Why does the dragon emerge at the dawn of the new world?.
    – yannis
    Jan 24, 2021 at 0:44
  • @yannis♦ Well, it could be possible; the symbolism is a little open to interpretation. It does put a different spin on it. Thx
    – DWKraus
    Jan 24, 2021 at 3:32

3 Answers 3


The short answer would be: in the available sources (Snorri's Prose Edda and a couple of poems from the Poetic Edda) there is no mention of a second Ragnarok and the event is presented as unique, as implied also by the etymology "fate of the gods".

There are however hints of a cyclical nature of the Norse cosmos, which might suggest the possibility of a repetition of the history of the universe, including the final eschatological event. Such hints are:

  • The survival of Lif and Lifthrasir, who will hide in a tree (probably Yggdrasill), and will repopulate the world of humans. This seems a lot like a second creation myth of mankind, a copy of the myth of the creation Askr and Embla from wood.
  • The post-Ragnarok pantheon, which can be seen as a double of the pre-Ragnarok one, with Thor's sons carrying Mjolnir, Odin's sons Vithar and Vali taking his place, and Baldr and Hodr coming back from Hel.

But the passage that has been used the most to argue for a cyclical nature of the Norse universe is the following, taken from the Voluspa (translation by Carolyne Larrington):

There comes the shadow-dark dragon flying,
the gleaming serpent, up from Dark-of-moon Hills;
Nidhogg flies over the plain, in his pinions
he carries corpses; now she will sink down.

This passage is the last stanza of the Voluspa, and it comes right after the description of Gimle, the glorious hall where all surviving gods will dwell after Ragnarok. The interpretation of this stanza has been much debated. If we retain the reading of the main available manuscripts, the sentence "now she will sink down" should refer to the seeress (the narrator of the Voluspa), who is about to disappear after having completed her prophecy. According to this intepretation, the reference to Nidhogg has been interpreted as an indication that even in the post-Ragnarok world evil will be present, and possibly another clash between the forces of good and evil will have to occur.

But this is just one possible interpretation of the stanza. Nidhogg could just be a narrative device that brings us back to the pre-Ragnarok world of the seeress, where evil still exists. This is what Larrington says about the stanza:

In the final verse the sinister dragon Nidhogg is seen as the seeress sinks out of her trance. Does evil still exist in the new world, or have we returned to the present where the dragon is a portent of Ragnarok?

Moreover, another school of thought renders the final sentence as "now he will sink" (see Lee M. Hollander's translation of the Voluspa). In this case it would not refer to the seeress, but to the serpent itself, who disappears in the new order of things.

I would like to add one more argument against the cyclicity of the Norse universe. The post-Ragnarok era is presented as an out-of-time golden age, in which "crops will grow unsown" (from Anthony Faulkes's translation of the Prose Edda), "all evil will be healed" (Larrington's translation of the Voluspa), and the gods will "live forever in ease and bliss" (Hollander's translation of the Voluspa). Such a description is in deep contrast with the pre-Ragnarok world, where both gods and men are in constant struggle with the forces of evil.


Some people here are speaking about Raganarok being cyclical. That's definitely one interpretation, but another interpretation that I was impressed by was that it already happened, that Ragnarok is a story of how our world came to be. Think of it, the man and woman who repopulate the world after taking shelter under Yggdrasil sound a lot like Adam and Eve.

  • 1
    Could you provide a source on the second interpretation you mentioned? The available sources are quite clear in placing Ragnarok in the future, and the creation myth of Askr and Embla in the past. Feb 27, 2021 at 1:25
  • @Gullintanni I remember this being mentioned in Neil Gaiman's Norse Mythology and by the occult editor and political pundit Styxhexenhammer. I couldn't tell you where to find their comments specifically, but I can tell you that Styx' was made in one of his occult videos. You mention the conflict between these two Norse stories, but if you look at the first two chapters of the Bible, there are conflicting creation narratives. Such overlap is quite common and does not inherently make one less true, meaningful, valid, or legitimate.
    – Bleda
    Feb 28, 2021 at 2:52
  • Oh ok, I though I had missed some medieval sources on Ragnarok. Gaiman's work is his own retelling of the stories from the Eddas, with no claim of being faithful to the sources. Styxhexenhammer is as far from an academic source as it gets. There are no conflicting creation narratives in the sources we have at our disposal. Feb 28, 2021 at 14:10
  • Gaiman says he got his ending from the Gylfaginning.
    – cmw
    Mar 2, 2021 at 1:49
  • Sure, he built upon it to make his own retelling of the story of Ragnarok. At no point in Gylfaginning Heimdallr says to Loki "It is not the end. There is no end. It is simply the end of the old times, Loki, and the beginning of the new times. Rebirth always follows death. You have failed.". Which is where, I think, @Bleda got the idea of cyclicity. Gaiman should never be taken as an academic source when discussing Norse mythology. Mar 11, 2021 at 11:34

Ragnorok is classified as "The end" in most Norse stories, but the myths don't actually see it as the end. In Norse Mythology everything would be cyclical, meaning that everything would happen over and over again which includes Ragnorok.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.