Timeline for What is the significance of this part in the myth of the resurrection of Osiris?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2021 at 21:16 | answer | added | tblue | timeline score: 0 | |
| May 17, 2021 at 15:41 | answer | added | Kevin Bumgartner | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 6, 2021 at 14:26 | comment | added | Isa | Could it be that the story symbolizes once more the supreme power of the Goddess - to even have the power to give a man his masculinity back and his capacity to procreate? Osiris becomes the king of the Underworld, guardian of the dead but before through her magic the Goddess created a child who will defy the dark force. She is rising in greater power by becoming the Mother of Horus, reconcile grief within her heart of the loss of her twin soul. It depicts the evolution of the feminine archetype from the Maiden ( complete with a man) to the Mother (complete with the child). | |
| Feb 4, 2021 at 20:48 | comment | added | Timothy | Osiris, before Seth murdered and dismembered him, had walked and reigned on Earth among the living. After his resurrection he lives and reigns only in the land of the dead. Could this imperfect resurrection be due to being physically incomplete? | |
| Jan 27, 2021 at 2:14 | answer | added | Philip Dorian | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 17, 2018 at 2:25 | answer | added | Glint | timeline score: 1 | |
| S May 2, 2018 at 10:42 | history | suggested | Glint | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Corrected spelling
|
| May 2, 2018 at 2:01 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S May 2, 2018 at 10:42 | |||||
| May 3, 2015 at 11:42 | vote | accept | Kreann | ||
| May 2, 2015 at 10:36 | history | edited | yannis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| May 2, 2015 at 4:26 | answer | added | anna v | timeline score: 11 | |
| May 2, 2015 at 3:51 | comment | added | Kreann | @fredsbend, or the opposite, if we consider that that the myth explains the resurrection of a castrated god, or a god that after resurrected, will not have such an important piece. It could have been the fingers or toes, the eyes, nose or some organ, but what was left missing is what essentially defines a man. Must be an important reading there! | |
| May 2, 2015 at 3:44 | comment | added | user93 | A certain penile fascination, perhaps? | |
| May 2, 2015 at 3:28 | history | edited | Kreann | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
| May 2, 2015 at 2:51 | review | First posts | |||
| May 2, 2015 at 6:33 | |||||
| May 2, 2015 at 2:47 | history | asked | Kreann | CC BY-SA 3.0 |